Employment Act coverage review
Contract of service classification checked against the Act's current, wider coverage following the 2022 amendments.
An independent audit of employment law compliance: Employment Act coverage, contract and entitlement documentation, termination and dismissal process quality, and workplace policy gaps, ending in a plan a board can act on.
An independent audit of an organisation's employment law compliance: Employment Act 1955 coverage and application, contract of service and entitlement documentation, termination and dismissal process compliance, and workplace policy review.
The Employment Act 1955 was amended in 2022 to cover a much wider range of employees than before, and many organisations have not revisited their contracts, entitlements and policies since. Termination and dismissal is the area that costs the most when it goes wrong: a dismissal without just cause or excuse, or a domestic inquiry that will not survive scrutiny, is usually only discovered at the Industrial Court. An audit finds the gap before a claim does.
Contract of service classification checked against the Act's current, wider coverage following the 2022 amendments.
Overtime, rest day and leave entitlement calculation and record-keeping checked against statutory minimums.
Process quality against just cause or excuse, and domestic inquiry documentation tested for whether it would survive an Industrial Court claim.
Core HR policies reviewed, including Anti-Sexual Harassment Act 2022 obligations and the complaint mechanism required under it.
Contracts of service checked for required terms and consistency with actual practice.
Findings ranked by exposure, with owners and target dates.
The same issues an Industrial Court claim or a labour inspection would surface, found and fixed first.
Checked against the Act's current, wider coverage, not the pre-amendment version many policies were written for.
Domestic inquiry quality and documentation reviewed, since that is what gets tested in a claim.
A review, not a referral to an HR outsourcing retainer.
A summary senior management can act on directly.
Workforce categories and existing HR documentation.
Contracts, entitlement records and policies against the Act.
Recent termination and dismissal cases, where available, reviewed for process quality.
HR and relevant managers on how policy is applied in practice.
Findings, remediation plan and a management summary.
Findings ranked by exposure, with evidence.
Specific calculation or record-keeping issues found.
Process and documentation quality against just cause and excuse.
Including Anti-Sexual Harassment Act compliance.
Owners, actions and target dates.
We do not resell products, so nothing here is shaped by a vendor margin. The recommendation is whatever your risk and your budget actually justify, including telling you that you do not need the engagement yet.
Findings come with a sequence, an owner and a realistic effort estimate, sized to the team you have rather than the team a framework assumes. A report that cannot be acted on is an expense, not a control.
Our people have carried the obligation internally, not only audited it. That shows up in what we consider proportionate, and in how much documentation we think you genuinely need.
Work is grounded in Malaysian law and regulator expectation, from the PDPA and the Cyber Security Act 2024 to Bursa, BNM and SC requirements, rather than translated from a European or American template.
Where an engagement includes training, the training component is structured to be HRD Corp SBL-Khas claimable, which changes what the programme costs you in practice.
No. The audit reviews process and documentation quality, not individual case representation. We can recommend where to seek that separately.
Yes, that is a specific focus, since many organisations have not revisited their contracts and policies since the amendments took effect.
Yes, as part of the workplace policy review, including whether the required complaint mechanism is actually in place and working.
The audit can include a focused review of a specific case alongside the general compliance review, scoped separately.
Typically two to four weeks, depending on workforce size and the number of policies and records to review.