SC Technology Risk Management Review

An SC technology risk management review checks a capital market entity's technology risk governance, processes and evidence against the SC's Guidelines on Technology Risk Management. The SC's Guidelines on Technology Risk Management replaced the old cyber risk guidelines in 2024 and added near-miss reporting, pre-deployment security assessment and penetration testing of critical systems. We review your compliance and evidence against them.

Against the Guidelines on Technology Risk Management, revised 19 August 2024 Near-miss reporting and pre-deployment gates Ready for an SC-appointed review

SC Technology Risk Management Review

What it is

A compliance review of a capital market entity's technology risk governance, processes and evidence against the SC guidelines. It reviews whether required testing happens and is evidenced; it does not perform the testing itself.

Why organisations need it

The guidelines apply to capital market entities including fund managers, brokers, platform operators and trustees. The 2024 revision requires near-miss reporting, a cyber security assessment before deploying a system, penetration testing before deploying new critical systems, and allows the SC to appoint an independent party to review compliance. Many entities have policies but not the evidence.

What the engagement covers

Board and management

Oversight and accountability.

Change and deployment

Pre-deployment assessments and testing gates.

Third parties and cloud

Oversight of providers.

Incidents and near misses

Identification and reporting to the SC.

AI and ML use

Ethical use guidance.

Evidence

Records an SC-appointed reviewer would request.

What the business gets out of it

Ready for scrutiny

Evidence in place.

Current guidelines

The 2024 revision, not the old cyber rules.

Practical gates

Release processes that comply.

Board confidence

Independent view.

Mid-level scope

Compliance review, no intrusive testing.

How it works

How the engagement runs

01

Scoping

Entity and systems.

02

Document review

Policies and records.

03

Walkthroughs

Change, incident and third-party processes.

04

Gap analysis

Against the guidelines.

05

Report

Findings and plan.

Deliverables

What you receive

Review report

Findings by risk.

Guideline mapping

Requirement by requirement.

Near-miss procedure

Draft or review.

Remediation plan

Owners and dates.

Board summary

Position for directors.

Who it is for

Who this is built for

Industries

Fund managersStockbrokersInvestment banksTrusteesCrowdfunding and digital asset platforms

Company sizes

Capital market entities

Departments

TechnologyRiskComplianceBoard
FAQ

FAQ

The SC Guidelines on Technology Risk Management, issued on 1 August 2023 and revised on 19 August 2024, which replaced the 2016 Guidelines on Management of Cyber Risk. They apply to capital market entities including fund managers, brokers, platform operators and trustees.

No. The guidelines require penetration testing before new critical systems are deployed; we review whether that testing happens and is properly evidenced. The testing itself is performed by licensed providers.

A near-miss is an event that could have caused a technology incident but did not. The 2024 revision requires near-miss events to be reported to the SC, which many entities have not yet built into their incident process. The review checks yours.

No. The guidelines allow the SC to appoint its own independent party to review compliance, and that reviewer is chosen by the SC. This review prepares you for one, so gaps are found and closed before an independent reviewer looks.

Typically three to six weeks, depending on the size of the entity. The review ends with findings mapped to the guidelines, the evidence gaps behind each one, and a remediation plan.