Critical services
Identifying services whose disruption harms customers or markets.
BNM's December 2025 discussion paper sets the direction, and the Responsibility Mapping policy already makes a senior manager accountable. We help institutions build the framework: critical services, impact tolerances, dependency maps and scenario tests.
A governance and risk engagement to design and implement an operational resilience framework, linked to existing business continuity, outsourcing and technology risk work.
BNM issued its Discussion Paper on Operational Resilience on 19 December 2025, with comments closing 30 April 2026. It is not yet a policy document, but Responsibility Mapping, in force since 1 January 2026, already requires a senior manager reporting to the CEO to own the operational resilience framework. Institutions need something for that person to own.
Identifying services whose disruption harms customers or markets.
Maximum tolerable disruption for each.
People, processes, technology and third parties.
Severe but plausible scenarios.
Accountable senior manager and board reporting.
Links to BCP, outsourcing and RMiT.
A framework for the accountable senior manager.
Built before it becomes mandatory.
Dependencies made visible.
Scenarios reveal weaknesses.
Uses existing BCP and risk work.
Current practices and gaps.
Critical services and tolerances.
Dependencies for priority services.
Scenario exercises.
Reporting and review cycle.
Policy and methodology.
With tolerances.
For priority services.
Results and actions.
For the accountable senior manager.
We do not resell products, so nothing here is shaped by a vendor margin. The recommendation is whatever your risk and your budget actually justify, including telling you that you do not need the engagement yet.
Findings come with a sequence, an owner and a realistic effort estimate, sized to the team you have rather than the team a framework assumes. A report that cannot be acted on is an expense, not a control.
Our people have carried the obligation internally, not only audited it. That shows up in what we consider proportionate, and in how much documentation we think you genuinely need.
Work is grounded in Malaysian law and regulator expectation, from the PDPA and the Cyber Security Act 2024 to Bursa, BNM and SC requirements, rather than translated from a European or American template.
Where an engagement includes training, the training component is structured to be HRD Corp SBL-Khas claimable, which changes what the programme costs you in practice.
The framework is at discussion paper stage. Responsibility Mapping, requiring a senior manager to own it, is in force.
BCP plans recovery of processes. Operational resilience starts from customer-facing services and tolerances and maps everything they depend on.
Banks, insurers, takaful operators and other BNM-regulated institutions.
We design and facilitate scenario tests. Technical recovery testing stays with your IT teams and vendors.
Typically three to six months for an initial framework and first scenario tests.
Tell us your institution type and existing BCP maturity. We will scope and quote.