Governance / Operational Resilience

Operational Resilience Framework

BNM's December 2025 discussion paper sets the direction, and the Responsibility Mapping policy already makes a senior manager accountable. We help institutions build the framework: critical services, impact tolerances, dependency maps and scenario tests.

Built on BNM's discussion paper and Responsibility Mapping Critical services, tolerances and dependencies Severe but plausible scenario testing
Overview

Operational Resilience Framework

What it is

A governance and risk engagement to design and implement an operational resilience framework, linked to existing business continuity, outsourcing and technology risk work.

Why organisations need it

BNM issued its Discussion Paper on Operational Resilience on 19 December 2025, with comments closing 30 April 2026. It is not yet a policy document, but Responsibility Mapping, in force since 1 January 2026, already requires a senior manager reporting to the CEO to own the operational resilience framework. Institutions need something for that person to own.

Key features

What the engagement covers

Critical services

Identifying services whose disruption harms customers or markets.

Impact tolerances

Maximum tolerable disruption for each.

Dependency mapping

People, processes, technology and third parties.

Scenario testing

Severe but plausible scenarios.

Governance

Accountable senior manager and board reporting.

Integration

Links to BCP, outsourcing and RMiT.

Business value

What the business gets out of it

Something to own

A framework for the accountable senior manager.

Ahead of the final policy

Built before it becomes mandatory.

Fewer blind spots

Dependencies made visible.

Tested

Scenarios reveal weaknesses.

Integrated

Uses existing BCP and risk work.

How it works

How the engagement runs

01

Assessment

Current practices and gaps.

02

Design

Critical services and tolerances.

03

Mapping

Dependencies for priority services.

04

Testing

Scenario exercises.

05

Governance

Reporting and review cycle.

Deliverables

What you receive

Framework document

Policy and methodology.

Critical services register

With tolerances.

Dependency maps

For priority services.

Scenario test report

Results and actions.

Board reporting template

For the accountable senior manager.

Who it is for

Who this is built for

Industries

Banks and Islamic banksInsurers and takaful operatorsDevelopment financial institutionsE-money issuersPayment companiesMoney services businesses

Company sizes

Licensed financial institutions

Departments

Operational riskBusiness continuityTechnology riskSenior managementBoard
Why Orbix

Why organisations choose Orbix

A governance approach, not a tool sale

We do not resell products, so nothing here is shaped by a vendor margin. The recommendation is whatever your risk and your budget actually justify, including telling you that you do not need the engagement yet.

Recommendations you can actually implement

Findings come with a sequence, an owner and a realistic effort estimate, sized to the team you have rather than the team a framework assumes. A report that cannot be acted on is an expense, not a control.

Consultants who have sat on your side of the table

Our people have carried the obligation internally, not only audited it. That shows up in what we consider proportionate, and in how much documentation we think you genuinely need.

Built for the Malaysian operating context

Work is grounded in Malaysian law and regulator expectation, from the PDPA and the Cyber Security Act 2024 to Bursa, BNM and SC requirements, rather than translated from a European or American template.

HRD Corp expertise where it applies

Where an engagement includes training, the training component is structured to be HRD Corp SBL-Khas claimable, which changes what the programme costs you in practice.

Questions

Questions we get asked

Is operational resilience mandatory yet?

The framework is at discussion paper stage. Responsibility Mapping, requiring a senior manager to own it, is in force.

How is this different from BCP?

BCP plans recovery of processes. Operational resilience starts from customer-facing services and tolerances and maps everything they depend on.

Which institutions is this for?

Banks, insurers, takaful operators and other BNM-regulated institutions.

Do you run technical recovery tests?

We design and facilitate scenario tests. Technical recovery testing stays with your IT teams and vendors.

How long does it take?

Typically three to six months for an initial framework and first scenario tests.

Get started

Give your accountable manager a framework

Tell us your institution type and existing BCP maturity. We will scope and quote.